Tenan v. Cain
This text of 41 A. 594 (Tenan v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s title as put in evidence by him at the trial rested upon the judgment in Mutual Life Insurance Co. to use, etc., v. Tenan, Exr., and the levari facias and sheriff’s deed in that case. [243]*243We have just reversed that judgment as unauthorized and void. It was incapable of supporting an execution, and as the defect was one apparent on the face of the record, the sheriff’s vendee would have taken no title, even if a purchaser without notice of the terre-tenant’s rights. It is clear therefore that appellant showed no title, and the learned judge below might properly have directed a verdict for the defendant. It is not therefore worth while to discuss the assignments of error. Whether correct or not the rulings did appellant no injury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A. 594, 188 Pa. 242, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tenan-v-cain-pa-1898.