Tenaglia v. Tenaglia
188 A. 370, 124 Pa. Super. 124, 1936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 341
Opinion
Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case—see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 341—but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, 188 A. 370, 124 Pa. Super. 124, 1936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 341 (Pa. Ct. App. 1936).
188 A. 370 (Tenaglia v. Tenaglia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shuda v. Shuda
423 A.2d 1242 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Mabry v. Baird
1950 OK 132 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)