Ten Forty-Five Main Street Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ten Forty-Five Main Street Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.

248 A.D. 632

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 632 (Ten Forty-Five Main Street Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ten Forty-Five Main Street Corp. v. Standard Oil Co., 248 A.D. 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the owner to recover the value of a garage which was destroyed by fire because of the alleged negligence of the defendant tenant. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant upon the verdict of a jury. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for the error in the admission of the testimony relative to the interests of plaintiff’s attorney in the litigation, received at folio 890. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm pursuant to the provisions of section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, being of opinion that the error was harmless; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the owner to recover the value of a garage which was destroyed by fire because of the alleged negligence of the defendant tenant. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant upon the verdict of a jury. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for the error in the admission of the testimony relative to the interests of plaintiff’s attorney in the litigation, received at folio 890. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm pursuant to the provisions of section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, being of opinion that the error was harmless; Carswell, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ten-forty-five-main-street-corp-v-standard-oil-co-nyappdiv-1936.