Ten Eyck v. Mayor of Keokuk
15 Iowa 486, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 156
Opinion
It is conceded by appellants that this case falls within the rules settled and recognized in [487] The State of Iowa, ex rel. The Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company, v. The County of Wapello, 13 Iowa, 388. This being so, and believing there are no good grounds for changing that ruling (see Smith v. Henry County, ante), we have no difficulty in affirming the order overrruling the demurrer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ten Eyck v. Mayor of Keokuk, 15 Iowa 486, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 156 (iowa 1863).
15 Iowa 486 (Ten Eyck v. Mayor of Keokuk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. County Court of Grant Co.
26 W. Va. 488 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Foote v. Mt. Pleasant
9 F. Cas. 368 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa, 1878)
Stewart v. Bd. of Super. of Polk County
30 Iowa 9 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)