Ten Broeck v. Mddlebrook

New York Supreme Court

Ten Broeck v. Mddlebrook

4 Wend. 205

DecidedMay 15, 1830

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Wend. 205 (Ten Broeck v. Mddlebrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ten Broeck v. Mddlebrook, 4 Wend. 205 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court refused to change the venue, the effect of which would have been to have removed this cause from the superior court of the city of New-York into this court. A trial [206]*206had already been had in the superior court, and The Court said that although they possessed the power to grant the motion after one trial had, they thought it most fit in ordinary cases, the cause should remain in the superior court for a gecon¿ trial, and thereupon denied the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court refused to change the venue, the effect of which would have been to have removed this cause from the superior court of the city of New-York into this court. A trial [206]*206had already been had in the superior court, and The Court said that although they possessed the power to grant the motion after one trial had, they thought it most fit in ordinary cases, the cause should remain in the superior court for a gecon¿ trial, and thereupon denied the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Wend. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ten-broeck-v-mddlebrook-nysupct-1830.