Templeton v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co.

114 N.W. 808, 134 Wis. 377, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 46
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 114 N.W. 808 (Templeton v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Templeton v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co., 114 N.W. 808, 134 Wis. 377, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 46 (Wis. 1908).

Opinion

TimliN, J.

The appellant assigns error because the trial court denied his motion to dismiss the respondent’s appeal to the circuit court from the award of commissioners, based on the ground that such appeal did not include the award of nominal damages to Mary E. Peffer. This objection cannot prevail under the rule of Brickles v. Milwaukee L., H. & T. Co., ante, p. 358, 114 N. W. 810. The trial court charged the jury in this case as he did in Marsh v. Milwaukee L., S. & T. Co., post, p. 384, 114 N. W. 804, and for this last error the judgment appealed from must be reversed.

By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brickles v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co.
114 N.W. 810 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Marsh v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co.
114 N.W. 804 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 N.W. 808, 134 Wis. 377, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/templeton-v-milwaukee-light-heat-traction-co-wis-1908.