Templeton v. Adar Co.
9 Misc. 2d 226, 172 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156
Opinion
This motion to vacate the notice to examine the plaintiff’s assignor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288) must be granted since the proceeding to examine by notice (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a) extends only to party, agent or employee (Shahmoon v. Shahmoon, N. Y. L. J., April 18, 1956, p. 15, col. 4). This is not indicative of any conclusion on the merits but solely to avoid a moot order (Manley v. Stuart Silver Co., 203 Misc. 218).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Templeton v. Adar Co., 9 Misc. 2d 226, 172 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1957).
9 Misc. 2d 226 (Templeton v. Adar Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manley v. Stuart Silver Co.
203 Misc. 218 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)