Templeton v. Adar Co.

New York Supreme Court

Templeton v. Adar Co.

9 Misc. 2d 226, 172 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156

DecidedNovember 18, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 2d 226 (Templeton v. Adar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Templeton v. Adar Co., 9 Misc. 2d 226, 172 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Irving H. Saypol, J.

This motion to vacate the notice to examine the plaintiff’s assignor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288) must be granted since the proceeding to examine by notice (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a) extends only to party, agent or employee (Shahmoon v. Shahmoon, N. Y. L. J., April 18, 1956, p. 15, col. 4). This is not indicative of any conclusion on the merits but solely to avoid a moot order (Manley v. Stuart Silver Co., 203 Misc. 218).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irving H. Saypol, J.

This motion to vacate the notice to examine the plaintiff’s assignor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288) must be granted since the proceeding to examine by notice (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a) extends only to party, agent or employee (Shahmoon v. Shahmoon, N. Y. L. J., April 18, 1956, p. 15, col. 4). This is not indicative of any conclusion on the merits but solely to avoid a moot order (Manley v. Stuart Silver Co., 203 Misc. 218).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Misc. 2d 226, 172 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/templeton-v-adar-co-nysupct-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack