Templeman Oil Corporation of Delaware v. Frantz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Templeman Oil Corporation of Delaware v. Frantz

1923 OK 851, 219 P. 676, 96 Okla. 3, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 173

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 23, 1923

Docket12174

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 851 (Templeman Oil Corporation of Delaware v. Frantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Templeman Oil Corporation of Delaware v. Frantz, 1923 OK 851, 219 P. 676, 96 Okla. 3, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 173 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

COCHRAN, J.

Plaintiffs iir error filed their brief herein on August 2, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendants in error, and no extension of time given to file same, and no reason assigned why brief has not been filed. Under the rule of this court, when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to' find some theory upon which judgment may be sustained. Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to vacate the order appointing receiver and restoring parties to their respective rights in the premises as they existed prior to the appointment of the receiver.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COCHRAN, J.

Plaintiffs iir error filed their brief herein on August 2, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendants in error, and no extension of time given to file same, and no reason assigned why brief has not been filed. Under the rule of this court, when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to' find some theory upon which judgment may be sustained. Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to vacate the order appointing receiver and restoring parties to their respective rights in the premises as they existed prior to the appointment of the receiver.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 851, 219 P. 676, 96 Okla. 3, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/templeman-oil-corporation-of-delaware-v-frantz-okla-1923.