Temple v. Cordell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Temple v. Cordell

1946 OK 218, 172 P.2d 412, 197 Okla. 385, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 561

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 19, 1946

DocketNo. 32673.

StatusPublished

This text of 1946 OK 218 (Temple v. Cordell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Temple v. Cordell, 1946 OK 218, 172 P.2d 412, 197 Okla. 385, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 561 (Okla. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVISON, J.

This is an original action brought by petitioner, David E. Temple, against J. Wm. Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, and Elmer Hale, Chairman of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, and T. J. Lucado, member of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, respondents, to require respondents to cause his name to be printed upon the official ballots for the general election to be held in November, 1946, as the nominee of the Democratic party for the office of State Senator from Tulsa County.

This case involves the identical factual situation as contained in the case of Latting v. J. Wm. Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, et al., 197 Okla. 369, 172 P. 2d 397. The law in the Latting Case, *386 supra, is decisive of the question herein. Writ denied.

GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVISON, J.

This is an original action brought by petitioner, David E. Temple, against J. Wm. Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, and Elmer Hale, Chairman of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, and T. J. Lucado, member of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, respondents, to require respondents to cause his name to be printed upon the official ballots for the general election to be held in November, 1946, as the nominee of the Democratic party for the office of State Senator from Tulsa County.

This case involves the identical factual situation as contained in the case of Latting v. J. Wm. Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, et al., 197 Okla. 369, 172 P. 2d 397. The law in the Latting Case, *386 supra, is decisive of the question herein. Writ denied.

GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1946 OK 218, 172 P.2d 412, 197 Okla. 385, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/temple-v-cordell-okla-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack