Temple v. Clinton Trust Company

64 A.2d 880, 1 N.J. 568, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 367
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 14, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 64 A.2d 880 (Temple v. Clinton Trust Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Temple v. Clinton Trust Company, 64 A.2d 880, 1 N.J. 568, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 367 (N.J. 1949).

Opinion

*569 Per Curiam.

A counsel fee will be allowed to Hannoch & Lassar, counsel for Pascal & Beckclman, Inc., and for William Beckelman, individually and as class representative, in the amount of twelve hundred fifty dollars, and to Herrigel, Linda-bury & Herrigel, counsel for Markley Opdyke, individually and as class representative, in the sum of seven hundred fifty dollars together with costs and expenses; said counsel fees to be paid from and charged pro rata against the amounts payable by Fidelity Union Trust Company to the common stockholders of Clinton Trust Company under the terms of the offer dated November 19, 1947, made by Fidelity Union Trust Company for the purchase of the assets of Clinton Trust Company.

For gran ling motion: Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—6.

Opposed: None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.2d 880, 1 N.J. 568, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/temple-v-clinton-trust-company-nj-1949.