Temple Trust Co. v. Haney
This text of 107 S.W.2d 368 (Temple Trust Co. v. Haney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case was prepared by Justice Baugh and is reported in 103 S.W.(2d) 1035. We have made an independent investigation of the questions presented in the applications and briefs filed in this court and have concluded that the Court of Civil Appeals has correctly decided each of them. It is, therefore, not deemed necessary or desirable for us to write further on the case.
As pointed out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, there is a conflict between its holding that the contracts involved are usurious and the holding of the Amarillo court on the same questions in Temple Trust Company v. Cooper (Tex.Civ.App.) 96 S. W.(2d) 408. In so far as the conflict exists, our approval of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case will be understood as a disapproval of the holding in the Cooper Case.
The applications of both parties for writs , of error were granted, but since neither has been awarded any relief, one-half the costs in this court will be assessed against each.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.
Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.W.2d 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/temple-trust-co-v-haney-tex-1937.