Temple, David Mark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Temple, David Mark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 31, 2012·No. WR-78,545-01·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-78,545-01
EX PARTE DAVID MARK TEMPLE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Johnson, J., filed a concurring statement.

C O N C U R R I N G S T A T E M E N T



I agree that this Court properly denies leave to file this application, but I note that the appropriate remedy for claims such as those presented here is to file, not an application for a writ of habeas corpus under this Court's original jurisdiction, but an application pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, art. 11.07: "After conviction the procedure outlined in [Article 11.07] shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner." Id. at § 5. Applicant is entitled to seek his desired relief through such an application and may do so if he so chooses.



Filed: October 31, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Temple, David Mark, (Tex. 2012).

Temple, David Mark (Temple, David Mark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.