Temitope a Olageshin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2020
Docket04-20-00057-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Temitope a Olageshin v. State (Temitope a Olageshin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Temitope a Olageshin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 31, 2020

No. 04-20-00057-CR

Temitope A OLAGESHIN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR13033 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on January 3, 2020, stating his intent to appeal the trial court’s December 4, 2019 order that increased the amount of his pretrial bond. We, however, do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. Courts of appeal “do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.” Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). A trial court’s order on a motion to modify the amount or conditions of a pretrial bond is not authorized by statute and therefore is not appealable. See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“There is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or the denial of bail.”); Ex parte Herrera, No. 04-18-00020-CR, 2018 WL 1733123, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Apr. 11, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to consider issues seeking to appeal the trial court’s order increasing the amount of the appellant’s pretrial bond); Sanchez v. State, 340 S.W.3d 848, 852 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.) (holding court of appeals lacked jurisdiction over appeal of pretrial order on motion for reduction of bond). It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court. _________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of January, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apolinar v. State
820 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Sanchez v. State
340 S.W.3d 848 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Ragston, Joshua Dewayne
424 S.W.3d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Temitope a Olageshin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/temitope-a-olageshin-v-state-texapp-2020.