Temesgen Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill

Fourth Circuit

Temesgen Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill

689 F. App'x 742

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2017·No. 17-1078·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*743 PER CURIAM:

Temesgen Teshome Abdissa appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill, No. 5:15-cv-00394-BO, 2017 WL 78479 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*743 PER CURIAM:

Temesgen Teshome Abdissa appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill, No. 5:15-cv-00394-BO, 2017 WL 78479 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Temesgen Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill, 689 F. App'x 742 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

689 F. App'x 742 (Temesgen Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related