Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc.

586 So. 2d 428, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9330

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1991

DocketNo. 90-3057, 91-0847

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 428 (Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc., 586 So. 2d 428, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9330 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and appellate presentment we do:

1. Affirm as to the main appeal brought by Telso, Inc.

2. Reverse the denial of attorney’s fees to cross-appellant, Walter N. Williams, from indemnitor, Telso, Inc., for defending the action brought by Unilease of Florida, Inc. See Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Postol, 142 So.2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Brown v. Financial Indent. Co., 366 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); and Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

3. We treat the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as a non-final appeal and affirm as to same.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and appellate presentment we do:

1. Affirm as to the main appeal brought by Telso, Inc.

2. Reverse the denial of attorney’s fees to cross-appellant, Walter N. Williams, from indemnitor, Telso, Inc., for defending the action brought by Unilease of Florida, Inc. See Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Postol, 142 So.2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Brown v. Financial Indent. Co., 366 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); and Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

3. We treat the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as a non-final appeal and affirm as to same.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 428, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telso-inc-v-unilease-of-florida-inc-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

1. Affirm as to the main appeal brought by Telso, Inc.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack