Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc.

586 So. 2d 428, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9330
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1991·No. No. 90-3057, 91-0847·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and appellate presentment we do:

1. Affirm as to the main appeal brought by Telso, Inc.

2. Reverse the denial of attorney’s fees to cross-appellant, Walter N. Williams, from indemnitor, Telso, Inc., for defending the action brought by Unilease of Florida, Inc. See Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Postol, 142 So.2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Brown v. Financial Indent. Co., 366 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); and Insurance Co. of North America v. King, 340 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

3. We treat the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as a non-final appeal and affirm as to same.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc., 586 So. 2d 428, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9330 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 428 (Telso, Inc. v. Unilease of Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation v. Postol
142 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Brown v. Financial Indem. Co.
366 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Insurance Co. of North America v. King
340 So. 2d 1175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)