Tellone v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Tellone v. Maass

752 P.2d 354, 90 Or. App. 436

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 13, 1988

Docket86C-11916; CA A45393

StatusPublished

This text of 752 P.2d 354 (Tellone v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tellone v. Maass, 752 P.2d 354, 90 Or. App. 436 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. At oral argument, petitioner’s counsel advised us that petitioner is no longer in defendant’s custody. Given that fact, any order requiring defendant to deliver petitioner to the court or release him would be futile. This appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Rahm v. Keeney, 83 Or App 266, 730 P2d 1297 (1986).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. At oral argument, petitioner’s counsel advised us that petitioner is no longer in defendant’s custody. Given that fact, any order requiring defendant to deliver petitioner to the court or release him would be futile. This appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Rahm v. Keeney, 83 Or App 266, 730 P2d 1297 (1986).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 P.2d 354, 90 Or. App. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tellone-v-maass-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack