Tellone v. Maass
752 P.2d 354, 90 Or. App. 436
Opinion
Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. At oral argument, petitioner’s counsel advised us that petitioner is no longer in defendant’s custody. Given that fact, any order requiring defendant to deliver petitioner to the court or release him would be futile. This appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Rahm v. Keeney, 83 Or App 266, 730 P2d 1297 (1986).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tellone v. Maass, 752 P.2d 354, 90 Or. App. 436 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
752 P.2d 354 (Tellone v. Maass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rahm v. Keeney
730 P.2d 1297 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Rahm v. Keeney
730 P.2d 1297 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)