Telloian v. Kazarian

California Court of Appeal

Telloian v. Kazarian

68 Cal. App. 347

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 22, 1924

DocketCiv. No. 4696

StatusPublished

This text of 68 Cal. App. 347 (Telloian v. Kazarian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telloian v. Kazarian, 68 Cal. App. 347 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

LANGDON, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment for respondent in an action brought by him to recover damages for the conversion of a certain crop of grapes grown upon a small tract of land upon which neither of the parties to the action resided. The only question presented is as to possession. Upon conflicting evidence the court found in favor of respondent. As there is evidence in the record to support this finding, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Sturtevant, J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LANGDON, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment for respondent in an action brought by him to recover damages for the conversion of a certain crop of grapes grown upon a small tract of land upon which neither of the parties to the action resided. The only question presented is as to possession. Upon conflicting evidence the court found in favor of respondent. As there is evidence in the record to support this finding, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Sturtevant, J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 Cal. App. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telloian-v-kazarian-calctapp-1924.