Tello v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tello v. State

523 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1015, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657, 1988 WL 36920

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1988

DocketNo. 86-500

StatusPublished

This text of 523 So. 2d 801 (Tello v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tello v. State, 523 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1015, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657, 1988 WL 36920 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s concession that the order revoking the defendant’s probation incorrectly recites that the defendant was found to have violated condition number 10 of the Order Granting Probation, to-wit: that the defendant failed to pay the costs of supervision, we direct that the order or revocation be modified to delete that recitation. As modified, the order of revocation is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s concession that the order revoking the defendant’s probation incorrectly recites that the defendant was found to have violated condition number 10 of the Order Granting Probation, to-wit: that the defendant failed to pay the costs of supervision, we direct that the order or revocation be modified to delete that recitation. As modified, the order of revocation is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 801, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1015, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657, 1988 WL 36920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tello-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.