Tellez v. Saranda Realty
This text of 197 A.D.2d 439 (Tellez v. Saranda Realty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.), entered October 9, 1992, which granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations and denied defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss the complaint based upon this defense, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
CPLR 205 (a) is a remedial statute and where a defendant is given timely notice of the nature of the claim in a prior action brought by the wrongly named party, the benefit of that statute will be applied unless the prior action was dismissed for the reasons specifically stated in CPLR 205 (a) (see, Carrick v Central Gen. Hosp., 51 NY2d 242). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.D.2d 439, 602 N.Y.S.2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tellez-v-saranda-realty-nyappdiv-1993.