Tellez v. Callejas

576 So. 2d 912, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2585, 1991 WL 40066
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1991·No. No. 90-809·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina C. Tellez, appeals a final judgment in an action for dissolution of a partnership. We affirm.

In an appellate proceeding, the decision of the trial court has a presumption of correctness. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Anderman v. Miller, 359 So.2d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). It is not the function of an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses in the trial court proceedings. Froman v. Froman, 458 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tellez v. Callejas, 576 So. 2d 912, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2585, 1991 WL 40066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 912 (Tellez v. Callejas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Froman v. Froman
458 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Anderman v. Miller
359 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)