Telles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Telles v. State

120 So. 3d 646, 2013 WL 4764637, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14318

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 2013

DocketNo. 5D13-1597

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 3d 646 (Telles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telles v. State, 120 So. 3d 646, 2013 WL 4764637, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14318 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea and was orally adjudicated guilty of grand theft of property valued at $100,000 or more, grand theft of a motor vehicle, and resisting an officer without violence. He was sentenced on each conviction. We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed. However, the written judgment shows that adjudication of guilt was withheld for the grand theft of a motor vehicle offense. This is not in conformity with the oral pronouncement. Therefore, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed, but remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the judgment.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea and was orally adjudicated guilty of grand theft of property valued at $100,000 or more, grand theft of a motor vehicle, and resisting an officer without violence. He was sentenced on each conviction. We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed. However, the written judgment shows that adjudication of guilt was withheld for the grand theft of a motor vehicle offense. This is not in conformity with the oral pronouncement. Therefore, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed, but remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the judgment.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 So. 3d 646, 2013 WL 4764637, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telles-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.