Tellers v. Muir

3 N.J.L. 749
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1811
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 749 (Tellers v. Muir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tellers v. Muir, 3 N.J.L. 749 (N.J. 1811).

Opinion

Pennington, J.

— I have certainly delivered such an opinion; but I understand my brethren have doubted the correctness of it.

Chetwood. — It has been so decided in the Court of the United States.

By the Court.

— There is enough on the bills of exception to show that the plaintiff below gave no evidence of a joint contract, and ought not to have prevailed.

— Went on the ground that the court below ought not to have permitted the note to have been read in evidence until some evidence had been given of the existence of the partnership.

Judgment reversed by the whole Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tellers-v-muir-nj-1811.