Teller v. Sommer

18 A. 1071, 132 Pa. 33, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 763
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 20, 1890·No. No. 290·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error in refusing to enter judgment against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. Assuming, as we must, for the present that the facts averred in the affidavit of defence are true, they are sufficient to entitle the defendant to a jury trial.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff, but without prejudice to his right to trial by jury, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teller v. Sommer, 18 A. 1071, 132 Pa. 33, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 763 (Pa. 1890).

18 A. 1071 (Teller v. Sommer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levin v. Garfinkle
492 F. Supp. 781 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1980)
Parkin v. Safe Deposit Bank
54 Pa. Super. 54 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Allegheny County Light Co. v. Thoma
31 Pa. Super. 102 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Newell Booth Co. v. Sheldrake
23 Pa. Super. 528 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)