Teller v. People

7 Colo. 451
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the appeal must he allowed upon the ground that no appeal lies from a judgment imposing a penalty for a contempt of court.

The cases of Ex parte Crittenden, 62 Cal. 534, and New Orleans v. Steamship Co. 20 Wall. 392, are conclusive upon the point that the imposition of fines and penalties in contempt proceedings pertains to criminal, and not civil jurisprudence.

In our judgment the proceedings in cases of this character partake sufficiently of the nature of criminal actions to warrant us in holding that they must be reviewed as such. Inasmuch, therefore, as appeals do not lie in this class of actions under our practice, this appeal must be dismissed and the cause remanded, and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teller v. People, 7 Colo. 451 (Colo. 1884).

7 Colo. 451 (Teller v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Handler v. Gordon
140 P.2d 622 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1943)
People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Kimsey
74 P.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
Dockerty v. People
44 P.2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1935)
People ex rel. Attorney General v. News-Times Publishing Co.
35 Colo. 253 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1906)
Shore v. People
26 Colo. 484 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)
Bloom v. People
23 Colo. 416 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1897)
Wyatt v. the People
28 P. 968 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1892)
Cooper v. People Ex Rel. Wyatt
22 P. 790 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)