TELLAM v. Mumford

69 So. 3d 1096, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15240, 2011 WL 4445983
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2011·No. 1D11-1343·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We quash the trial court’s order and remand for a hearing to determine whether respondents’ claim rests on a reasonable basis and whether the notice of intent to initiate litigation was in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirement of sections 766.201-766.212, Florida Statutes (2009). See Martin Mem’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Herber, 984 So.2d 661, 663-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“ ‘[w]hen one of the parties files a motion under section 766.206, the trial court must determine whether the opposing party’s claim ... “rests on a reasonable basis” and whether the notice of intent to sue ... is “in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss 766.201-766.212.” ’ ” (quoting Duffy v. Brooker, 614 So.2d 539, 544-45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993))).

Petition granted.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TELLAM v. Mumford, 69 So. 3d 1096, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15240, 2011 WL 4445983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

69 So. 3d 1096 (TELLAM v. Mumford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duffy v. Brooker
614 So. 2d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER v. Herber
984 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)