Telgheder v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

273 A.D.2d 224, 709 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6287

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County [225]*225(Beisner, J.), dated March 22, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The action was properly dismissed as time-barred (see, Zaiman v Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 186 AD2d 555; Luka v New York City Tr. Auth., 100 AD2d 323, affd 63 NY2d 667; see also, Rose v Metro N. Commuter R. R., 143 AD2d 993). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Telgheder v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 273 A.D.2d 224, 709 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 224 (Telgheder v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luka v. New York City Transit Authority
468 N.E.2d 706 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Luka v. New York City Transit Authority
100 A.D.2d 323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad
143 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
186 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)