Telfer v. Maher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Telfer v. Maher

270 A.D.2d 494, 705 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 270 A.D.2d 494 (Telfer v. Maher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telfer v. Maher, 270 A.D.2d 494, 705 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered October 21, 1998, which denied his objection to so much of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, H.E.), entered August 6, 1998, as directed him to pay child support arrears in the amount of $2,746.65.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objection to the order of the Hearing Examiner. Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]; Matter of Simmons v Hyland, 235 AD2d 67, 71; Matter of Beaudoin v Joseph K., 165 AD2d 359). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered October 21, 1998, which denied his objection to so much of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, H.E.), entered August 6, 1998, as directed him to pay child support arrears in the amount of $2,746.65.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objection to the order of the Hearing Examiner. Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]; Matter of Simmons v Hyland, 235 AD2d 67, 71; Matter of Beaudoin v Joseph K., 165 AD2d 359). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 494, 705 N.Y.S.2d 286, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telfer-v-maher-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack