Telesco v. Lawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Telesco v. Lawley

21 A.D.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3702

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 750 (Telesco v. Lawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telesco v. Lawley, 21 A.D.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum : While this court attempts to expedite appeals in proceedings relating to primary or election matters there continues to be minimal requirements beyond which we may not go. The record presented upon argument of the appeal was not stipulated by the respective attorneys, certified by any attorney or settled by Special Term. The oral arguments centered upon the adequacy or sufficiency of the record. The stipulation submitted after oral argument by some of the parties to the appeal, but not all, is hopelessly inadequate to pass upon the issues. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term adjudging the designating petition of Heckman valid and dismissing petition in proceeding.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum : While this court attempts to expedite appeals in proceedings relating to primary or election matters there continues to be minimal requirements beyond which we may not go. The record presented upon argument of the appeal was not stipulated by the respective attorneys, certified by any attorney or settled by Special Term. The oral arguments centered upon the adequacy or sufficiency of the record. The stipulation submitted after oral argument by some of the parties to the appeal, but not all, is hopelessly inadequate to pass upon the issues. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term adjudging the designating petition of Heckman valid and dismissing petition in proceeding.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telesco-v-lawley-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack