Telegdi v. State Bar

208 Cal. 793
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1929
DocketL. A. No. 12020
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Cal. 793 (Telegdi v. State Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Telegdi v. State Bar, 208 Cal. 793 (Cal. 1929).

Opinion

PRESTON, J.

Special counsel appearing for petitioner moves his admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the courts of this state.

The identical state of facts found in the case of Norman C. Howden v. The State Bar of California, ante, p. 604 [283 Pac. 820], this day decided, is made a part of his petition; therefore, upon authority of said last-mentioned case, it is hereby ordered that petitioner, John L. Telegdi, be and he is hereby admitted to practice in all the courts of this state, and the clerk will deliver him a certificate of such authority upon his taking the prescribed oath and signing the roll of attorneys.

Waste, C. J., Richards, J., Seawell, J., Langdon, J., and Shenk, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howden v. State Bar
283 P. 820 (California Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Cal. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telegdi-v-state-bar-cal-1929.