Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp.

Federal Circuit

Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2011

Docket2011-1491

StatusUnpublished

This text of Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp. (Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court ofA11peaIs for the FederaI Circuit TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, _ Plaintiff-Appellan,t, k V. HARRIS CORPORATION, Defenclant-Appellee. 2011-1491 . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 11-CV-0i39, Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ON MOTION Before PROST, Circuit Judge. 0 R D E R Teledyne Technologies, incorporated moves to expe- dite the briefing schedule and decision by this court. Teledyne may of c0urse, without order from this court, expedite the briefing schedule by filing its own briefs significantly early. H0wever, the briefing schedule sug- gested by Teledyne proposes no such significant expedited

TELEDYNE TECH V. HARRIS CORP 2 briefing. The case will be assigned to a panel after brief- ing is completed, which is the usual course. Upon consideration thereof I'r ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FoR THE CoURT 1 /s/ Jan Ho1‘baly Date J an Horbaly cc: Frederick A. Lorig, Esq. Hen1'y C. Bunsow, Esq. s8 Clerk _ FlLED v.S. count or APPEALs ma THE FEoERAL olRcurr ~ AUG 01 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court ofA11peaIs for the FederaI Circuit TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, _ Plaintiff-Appellan,t, k V. HARRIS CORPORATION, Defenclant-Appellee. 2011-1491 . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 11-CV-0i39, Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ON MOTION Before PROST, Circuit Judge. 0 R D E R Teledyne Technologies, incorporated moves to expe- dite the briefing schedule and decision by this court. Teledyne may of c0urse, without order from this court, expedite the briefing schedule by filing its own briefs significantly early. H0wever, the briefing schedule sug- gested by Teledyne proposes no such significant expedited

TELEDYNE TECH V. HARRIS CORP 2 briefing. The case will be assigned to a panel after brief- ing is completed, which is the usual course. Upon consideration thereof I'r ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FoR THE CoURT 1 /s/ Jan Ho1‘baly Date J an Horbaly cc: Frederick A. Lorig, Esq. Hen1'y C. Bunsow, Esq. s8 Clerk _ FlLED v.S. count or APPEALs ma THE FEoERAL olRcurr ~ AUG 01 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. Harris Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teledyne-technologies-inc-v-harris-corp-cafc-2011.