Telecommunications Innovations v. Division of Personnel

West Virginia Court of Claims

Telecommunications Innovations v. Division of Personnel

21 Ct. Cl. 80

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 26, 1996

DocketCC-95-291

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 80 (Telecommunications Innovations v. Division of Personnel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Telecommunications Innovations v. Division of Personnel, 21 Ct. Cl. 80 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegation sin the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $879.32 for maintenance service on the respondent’s telephone system. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the services with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent asserts that a portion of the maintenance work should have been covered by a service contract between the claimant and the respondent. Therefore, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $789.32, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $789.32 as satisfaction for the claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $789.32.

Award of $789.32.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegation sin the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $879.32 for maintenance service on the respondent’s telephone system. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the services with its Notice of Claim. In its Answer, the respondent asserts that a portion of the maintenance work should have been covered by a service contract between the claimant and the respondent. Therefore, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $789.32, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which this amount could have been paid. Subsequently, the claimant contacted the Court and indicated it would accept $789.32 as satisfaction for the claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $789.32.

Award of $789.32.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/telecommunications-innovations-v-division-of-personnel-wvctcl-1996.