Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership

Federal Circuit

Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 2010

Docket09-1523

StatusUnpublished

This text of Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership (Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1523

TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Corby R. Vowell, Goldstein, Faucett & Prebeg, LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Edward W. Goldstein.

Kevin P. Anderson, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were James H. Wallace, Jr. and Karin A. Hessler. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph E. Addiego, III, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of San Francisco, California.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Judge Susan Illston NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1523

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-03063

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 6, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1523

TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Corby R. Vowell, Goldstein, Faucett & Prebeg, LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Edward W. Goldstein.

Kevin P. Anderson, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were James H. Wallace, Jr. and Karin A. Hessler. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph E. Addiego, III, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of San Francisco, California.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Judge Susan Illston NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1523

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-03063

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MAYER, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 6, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teknowledge-corp-v-cellco-partnership-cafc-2010.