TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC

S.D. Ohio

TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC

DecidedJuly 19, 2024

Docket3:24-cv-00204

StatusUnknown

This text of TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC (TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC, (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

TEK FOR YOUR LIFE, LLC, : Case No. 3:24-cv-00204 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Michael J. Newman : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : GUARDIAN PHARMACY, LLC, et al., : Defendants. : :

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Plaintiff TEK For Your Life, LLC has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than fourteen days from the date of this Order. A sample “Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement” is available on the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), any party may serve and file specific, written objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days if this Order is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Order objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Order is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting

party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

TEK FOR YOUR LIFE, LLC, : Case No. 3:24-cv-00204 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Michael J. Newman : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : GUARDIAN PHARMACY, LLC, et al., : Defendants. : :

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Plaintiff TEK For Your Life, LLC has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than fourteen days from the date of this Order. A sample “Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement” is available on the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), any party may serve and file specific, written objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days if this Order is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Order objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Order is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting

party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

TEK For Your Life, LLC v. Guardian Pharmacy, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tek-for-your-life-llc-v-guardian-pharmacy-llc-ohsd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack