Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 2016·No. 153252·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 8, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

153252 & (3)(5) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

TEJINDER SINGH and ANTHONY RISSAS, Justices Plaintiffs,

v SC: 153252 BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 8, 2016

d0405 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E, (Mich. 2016).

Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E (Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.