Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E
This text of Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E (Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 8, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 153252 & (3)(5) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, TEJINDER SINGH and ANTHONY RISSAS, Justices Plaintiffs, v SC: 153252 BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to dismiss is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 8, 2016 d0405 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tejinder Singh and Anthony Rissas v. Board of Law E, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tejinder-singh-and-anthony-rissas-v-board-of-law-e-mich-2016.