Tejeda v. State
943 So. 2d 267, 2006 WL 3302826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2006·No. 3D06-2350·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Jorge TEJEDA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jorge Tejeda, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The claims appellant raised did not render the sentence "illegal" for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition. The claims should have been raised via 3.850 and are now time barred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tejeda v. State, 943 So. 2d 267, 2006 WL 3302826 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
943 So. 2d 267 (Tejeda v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamond Drywall v. Mashan Contractors Inc.
943 So. 2d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)