Tejada v. Wetzel

55 A.3d 1048
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 16, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.3d 1048 (Tejada v. Wetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tejada v. Wetzel, 55 A.3d 1048 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

[1049]*1049 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2012, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s Motions for Sanctions and for Correction of the Record are DENIED. Appellant’s Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.3d 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tejada-v-wetzel-pa-2012.