Tejada v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tejada v. Scott

177 A.D.2d 456, 576 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18069

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D.2d 456 (Tejada v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tejada v. Scott, 177 A.D.2d 456, 576 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner’s unopposed application under CPLR article 78, in the nature of mandamus, to authorize the employment of investigative services pursuant to article 18-B, § 722-c of the County Law to aid in his defense to an underlying criminal action, is unanimously granted, without costs, to the extent only of referring the same for review, evaluation and determination by the Hon. Peter J. McQuillan, Administrative Judge of the Supreme Court, Criminal Branch, New York County. (Cfi, the recently promulgated 22 NYCRR 127.2 [a] and the reference therein to "a person providing investigative * * * services”.) Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner’s unopposed application under CPLR article 78, in the nature of mandamus, to authorize the employment of investigative services pursuant to article 18-B, § 722-c of the County Law to aid in his defense to an underlying criminal action, is unanimously granted, without costs, to the extent only of referring the same for review, evaluation and determination by the Hon. Peter J. McQuillan, Administrative Judge of the Supreme Court, Criminal Branch, New York County. (Cfi, the recently promulgated 22 NYCRR 127.2 [a] and the reference therein to "a person providing investigative * * * services”.) Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D.2d 456, 576 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tejada-v-scott-nyappdiv-1991.