Teixeira v. Home Depot, Inc.
Opinion
The plaintiff, Robert Teixeira, appeals from the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commissioner (commissioner) (1) denying the plaintiff's request for a continuance on the rescheduled trial date and (2) concluding that the plaintiff had not met his burden of proof that his discharge from employment by the defendant, The Home Depot, Inc., was retaliatory in violation of the Workers' Compensation Act, General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. (act). 1 We affirm the decision of the commissioner.
After careful review of the record, including the commissioner's decision, and the parties' appellate briefs and oral arguments, we conclude that the commissioner did not abuse her discretion in denying the plaintiff's
request for a continuance on the day of the rescheduled trial. See
Bove
v.
Bove
,
We further conclude that the commissioner properly dismissed the plaintiff's claim of wrongful discharge after finding that the plaintiff failed to meet his initial burden of proof that his discharge was based on his filing a claim or otherwise exercising his rights under the act. The record simply does not reflect that the plaintiff had filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits or otherwise exercised the rights afforded to him pursuant to § 31-290a prior to being notified that his temporary employment by the defendant was coming to an end.
The decision of the Workers' Compensation Commissioner is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
164 A.3d 836 (Teixeira v. Home Depot, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.