Teitleman v. Porter Smith Co.

143 A. 721, 103 N.J. Eq. 412, 2 Backes 412, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 679
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzehbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teitleman v. Porter Smith Co., 143 A. 721, 103 N.J. Eq. 412, 2 Backes 412, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 679 (N.J. 1928).

143 A. 721 (Teitleman v. Porter Smith Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.
272 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Gottlaub v. Cohen
51 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
State Highway Com. v. Golden
163 A. 551 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Bianchi v. Herman
147 A. 505 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)