Teitelbaum v. Waltuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Teitelbaum v. Waltuch

181 A.D. 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 895 (Teitelbaum v. Waltuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teitelbaum v. Waltuch, 181 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Upon a motion to change the place of trial in a transitory action, where the number of witnesses is about equal in each county, we think as a general rule it would be in furtherance of justice to try the ease in the county where the cause of action arose, and we apply that rule in reversing this order. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Upon a motion to change the place of trial in a transitory action, where the number of witnesses is about equal in each county, we think as a general rule it would be in furtherance of justice to try the ease in the county where the cause of action arose, and we apply that rule in reversing this order. Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teitelbaum-v-waltuch-nyappdiv-1917.