Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance
This text of 250 A.D. 773 (Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover under a policy of life insurance, plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion to strike out the defendant’s three separate defenses, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defenses are clearly sufficient in law. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 773, 295 N.Y.S. 746, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teitelbaum-v-new-york-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1937.