Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance

Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance

250 A.D. 773, 295 N.Y.S. 746, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8937
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1937·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover under a policy of life insurance, plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion to strike out the defendant’s three separate defenses, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defenses are clearly sufficient in law. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance, 250 A.D. 773, 295 N.Y.S. 746, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 773 (Teitelbaum v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.