Teitelbaum v. Massachusetts Accident Co.
This text of 184 A. 808 (Teitelbaum v. Massachusetts Accident Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. It should, however, be noted that the plaintiff below admitted that he treated about four patients a week and not four patients a day as inadvertently stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A. 808, 116 N.J.L. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teitelbaum-v-massachusetts-accident-co-nj-1936.