Teig v. Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc.

241 A.D.2d 448, 663 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7278
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated June 11, 1996, as directed the defendant to “fully and completely” comply with a prior order directing discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The propriety of the disclosure device fashioned by the court is not properly before this Court, since use of that disclosure [449] device was directed in a prior order of the same court dated September 29, 1995, from which no appeal was taken (see, Damen v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 234 AD2d 255). In any event, the defendant’s contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teig v. Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc., 241 A.D.2d 448, 663 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 448 (Teig v. Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re B. Seminara Construction Corp.
291 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)