Teichner v. United States

116 Ct. Cl. 869, 1949 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 12, 1949 WL 4920
United States Court of Claims·Decided December 5, 1949·No. No. 48577; No. 48629·Published

Opinion

[873] The court decided that the plaintiffs were entitled to re-

cover in an opinion

per curiam

as follows:

These cases present the same legal questions which were before this court in the cases of Thomas C. Gibney v. The [874] United States No. 48572; Joseph M. Ahearn v. The United States, No. 48610; and Donald M. Taylor v. The United States, No. 48611, all decided June 6, 1949 [114 C. Cls. 38, 65, 59]. The plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to recover for the reasons given in those cases. Entry of judgments will be suspended to await the filing of a stipulation showing the amounts to which the plaintiffs are entitled.

In accordance with the above opinion, on July 10, 1950, judgments were entered as follows:

No. 48577, Stephen J. Teichner_$265.07
No. 48629, Paul G. Maki-$880. 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teichner v. United States, 116 Ct. Cl. 869, 1949 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 12, 1949 WL 4920 (cc 1949).

116 Ct. Cl. 869 (Teichner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibney v. United States
114 Ct. Cl. 38 (Court of Claims, 1949)