Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc.
776 So. 2d 281, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, 2000 WL 1671406
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1707·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(stating that “[w]here fraud or ... invalidity of contract is alleged as to an entire agreement rather than specifically as to the arbitration clause contained within that agreement, the entire matter should be resolved by arbitration.”). See also Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp. v. Grandison, 701 So.2d 1202, 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc., 776 So. 2d 281, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, 2000 WL 1671406 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
776 So. 2d 281 (Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Demorizi v. Demorizi
851 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Sterling v. Brevard County
776 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)