Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc.

776 So. 2d 281, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, 2000 WL 1671406

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-1707

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 281 (Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teichner v. Concorde Trading Group, Inc., 776 So. 2d 281, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, 2000 WL 1671406 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(stating that “[w]here fraud or ... invalidity of contract is alleged as to an entire agreement rather than specifically as to the arbitration clause contained within that agreement, the entire matter should be resolved by arbitration.”). See also Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp. v. Grandison, 701 So.2d 1202, 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(stating that “[w]here fraud or ... invalidity of contract is alleged as to an entire agreement rather than specifically as to the arbitration clause contained within that agreement, the entire matter should be resolved by arbitration.”). See also Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp. v. Grandison, 701 So.2d 1202, 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(same).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

776 So. 2d 281, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, 2000 WL 1671406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teichner-v-concorde-trading-group-inc-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack