Teichmann v. Parrish

157 F.2d 75, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 217, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2676

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant’s other assignments of error are also without merit.

Affirmed.