Tehan v. Shott

Supreme Court

Tehan v. Shott

381 U.S. 923, 85 S. Ct. 1560

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 24, 1965

DocketNo. 877

StatusPublished

This text of 381 U.S. 923 (Tehan v. Shott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tehan v. Shott, 381 U.S. 923, 85 S. Ct. 1560 (1965).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted. The parties are requested to brief and argue the question of the retroactivity of the doctrine announced in Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents, being of the view that the case should be remanded to the District Court for a finding on allegation that the respondent at the trial waived any objection to the comment made on his failure to testify. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted. The parties are requested to brief and argue the question of the retroactivity of the doctrine announced in Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents, being of the view that the case should be remanded to the District Court for a finding on allegation that the respondent at the trial waived any objection to the comment made on his failure to testify. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

381 U.S. 923, 85 S. Ct. 1560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tehan-v-shott-scotus-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack