Tegegnework Eshete v. Eric Holder, Jr.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 7, 2012
• Docket: 11-1513
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1513

TEGEGNEWORK TARKU ESHETE, a/k/a Johannes Gebreamlak,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 18, 2012 Decided: February 7, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Solomon Bekele, LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Assistant Director, John J. W. Inkeles, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tegegnework Tarku Eshete, a native and citizen of

Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider.

We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order

and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011);

Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (setting

forth standard of review). We therefore deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Eshete

(B.I.A. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED