Tefft v. Grant

279 U.S. 824, 49 S. Ct. 479
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 20, 1929·No. No. 759·Published·Cited by 73 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is disissed for want-of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tefft v. Grant, 279 U.S. 824, 49 S. Ct. 479 (1929).

279 U.S. 824 (Tefft v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Arroyo
973 A.2d 1254 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)
Easlick v. State
2004 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2004)
Rogers v. State
846 S.W.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
In re Grand Jury Subpoena
144 F.R.D. 357 (D. Minnesota, 1992)
State v. Jenks
574 N.E.2d 492 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Robinson
567 A.2d 1173 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)
United States v. Suntar Roofing, Inc.
709 F. Supp. 1526 (D. Kansas, 1989)
In re Grand Jury Proceedings
708 F. Supp. 492 (E.D. New York, 1988)
Hankins v. State
646 S.W.2d 191 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
State v. Adcock
310 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
United States v. Roberto Louis Bosch Morales
677 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Brown
521 F. Supp. 511 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1981)
United States v. Alberto Espinosa-Cerpa
630 F.2d 328 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
In Re Grand Jury No. 79-3 Agan
498 F. Supp. 493 (N.D. Georgia, 1980)
United States v. Joseph B. Davis
562 F.2d 681 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Crum
404 F. Supp. 1161 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Woods v. Dunlop
334 A.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)