Teeter v. . Newell
This text of 169 S.E. 804 (Teeter v. . Newell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant Newell to recover upon certain notes executed by J. B. Linker. He alleged that Newell was a partner with Linker in the purchase of certain land, and that the notes were given in payment of the purchase price. The defendant Newell denied that he was a partner and offered testimony to the effect that the had loaned Linker money to buy land, but that he was not interested in any of the purchasers. The issue of indebtedness was answered by the jury in favor of defendant, and from judgment upon the verdict the plaintiff appealed. The evidence discloses a controverted issue of fact, and the verdict is determinative of the controversy. No exception presented in the record warrants the overthrow of the judgment.
No error. *Page 805
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 S.E. 804, 204 N.C. 804, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teeter-v-newell-nc-1933.